 |
Module 4: Ethical Issues in Reproductive Genetics Research |
|
|
|
Bibliography
Acuff KL, Faden RR. A history of prenatal and newborn screening programs: lessons for the future, in AIDS, women and the next generation: towards a morally acceptable public policy on HIV screening of pregnant women and newborns, (RR Faden, G Geller, GM Powers, Eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, 1991. Andrews L. The clone age: adventures in the new world of reproductive technology. New York: Hering Holt, 1999. ASRM Ethics Committee Report. Informed consent and the use of gametes and embryos for research. Fertility and Sterility. 1997;68:780-1. ASRM Ethics Committee Report. Human somatic cell nuclear transfer (cloning). Fertility and Sterility. 2000;74:873-876. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Perinatal ethics: a practical method of analysis of obligations to mother and fetus. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1985;66:442-446. Childress JF. Sources of stem cells: Ethical controversies and policy developments in the United States. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 2004;19:119-123. Cowan RS. Women’s roles in the history of amniocentesis and chorionic villi sampling. In Women and prenatal testing: facing the challenges of genetic technology. (KH Rothenberg, EJ Thomson, Eds.), Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1994. Cowan RS. Genetic technology and reproductive choice: an ethics for autonomy. In The code of codes: scientific and social issues in the human genome project (DJ Kevles, L Hood, Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992. Davis D. Genetic dilemmas and the child’s right to an open future. Hastings Center Report. 1997;27:7-15. Fletcher JC. Ethical issues in genetic screening and antenatal diagnosis. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1981;24:1151-1168. Fletcher JC, Wertz DC. Ethical aspects of prenatal diagnosis: Views of US medical geneticists. Clinics in Perinatology. 1987;14:293-312. Fost NC. Conception for donation. JAMA. 2004;291:2125-2126. Gaze B, Dawson K. Distinguishing medical practice and research: The special case of IVF. Bioethics. 1989;3:301-319. Geller G, Botkin JR, Green MJ, Press N, Biesecker BB, Wilfond B, et al. Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer: the process and content of informed consent. JAMA. 1997;277:1467-1474. Genetics and Public Policy Center. Public awareness and attitudes about reproductive genetic technology. Washington, DC: Phoebe R. Berman Bioethics Institute, 2002. Available at http://dnapolicy-content.labvelocity.com/pdfs/4/27374.pdf; accessed December 2004. Guidelines for the ethical, social and legal issues in prenatal diagnosis. A report from the Genetics Research Group of the Hastings Center, Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences. New England Journal of Medicine. 1979;300:168-172. Holtzman NA, Watson MS. Promoting safe and effective genetic testing in the U.S.: final report of the Task Force on Genetic Testing. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998. Human Genetics Commission and Human Fertilisation and Embryo Authority. Outcome of public consultation on preimplantation genetic diagnosis. November 2001. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/AboutHFEA/Consultations/PGD%20outcome.pdf; accessed December 2004. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority. Sex selection: options for regulation. 2003 http://www.hfea.gov.uk/AboutHFEA/Consultations; accessed December 2004. Johnson SR, Elkins TE. Ethical issues in prenatal diagnosis. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1988;31:408-417. Kahn JP, Mastroianni AC. Creating a stem cell donor: a case study in reproductive genetics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2004;14:81-96. Kalfoglou AL, Doksum T, Bernhardt B, Geller G, LeRoy L, Mathews DJH, et al. American opinions on reproductive genetic technologies: Hopes and fears for our genetic future. Submitted for publication 2004. Kalfoglou AL, Geller G. A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation. Fertility and Sterility. 2000;74:660-667. Laken SJ, Petersen GM, Gruber SB, Oddoux C, Ostrer H, Giardiello FM, Hamilton SR, Hampel H, Markowitz A, Klimstra D, Jhanwar S, Winawer S, Offit K, Luce MC, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Familial colorectal cancer in Ashkenazim due to a hypermutable tract in APC. Nature Genetics. 1997;17:79-83. Markel H. Scientific advances and social risks: historical perspectives of genetic screening programs for sickle cell disease, Tay-Sachs disease, neural tube defects and down sydrome, 1970-1997. In Promoting safe and effective genetic testing in the U.S.: final report of the Task Force on Genetic Testing, (NA Holtzman, MS Watson, Eds.), Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998. McGee G. Parenting in an era of genetics. Hastings Center Report. 1997;27:16-22. Munne S, Magli C, Cohen J, et al. Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos. Human Reproduction. 1999;14:2191-2199. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants, vol. 1: report and recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Bethesda, MD, 2001. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants, vol. 1: report and recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Bethesda, MD, 2001. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Cloning human beings, vol. 1: Report and recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Bethesda, MD, 1997. The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law. Assisted reproductive technologies: analysis and recommendations for public policy. New York: New York State Task Force on Life and the Law,1998. The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law. Genetic testing and screening in the age of genomic medicine. New York: New York State Task Force on Life and the Law, 2000. Parens E, Asch A. Prenatal testing and disability rights. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000. Parens E, Knowles LP. Reprogenetics and public policy: reflections and recommendations. Hastings Center Report. 2003;33:S3-S24. Powell CM. The current state of prenatal genetic testing in the U.S. In Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, (E Parens, A Asch, Eds.), Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000, 44-53. The President’s Council on Bioethics. Reproduction and responsibility: The regulation of new biotechnologies. Washington, DC. The President’s Council on Bioethics, 2004. Available at http://www.bioethics.gov/reports; accessed December 2004. Robertson JA. Children of Choice: Freedom and the new reproductive technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994. Robertson JA. Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: the ethical debate. Ethical issues in new uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Human Reproduction. 2003;18:465-471. Rothenberg KH, Thomson EJ. Women & prenatal testing: facing the challenges of genetic technology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1994. Sermon K, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Lancet. 2004;363:1633-1641. Struewing JP, Hartge P, Wacholder S, Baker SM, Berlin M, McAdams M, Timmerman MM, Brody LC, Tucker MA. The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. New England Journal of Medicine. 1997;15;336:1401-8. Verlinsky Y, Cohen J, Munne S, Gianaroli L, Simpson JL, Ferraretti AP, Kuliev A. Over a decade of experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a multicenter report. Fertility and Sterility. 2004;82:292-4. Verlinsky Y, Kuliev A. Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in assisted reproduction. Minerva Ginecol. 2004;56:197-203. Walters L. Ethics and new reproductive technologies: An international review of committee statements. Hastings Center Report. 1987:17:S3-S9. The Wellcome Trust. Public perspectives on human cloning: A social research study. 1998. London: Charity Commission. Available at http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/doc%5Fwtd003422.html; accessed December 2004. Wertz
DC, Fletcher
JC. Fatal
knowledge? Prenatal
diagnosis and
sex selection.
Hastings Center
Report. 1989;19:21-27.
The materials on this site and in each module are copyrighted by Duke University and Johns Hopkins University and may not be copied, transmitted, or published without explicit written permission. © 2005 Duke Universtiy Medical Center and Johns Hopkins University. Site Design by MediSpin, Inc. Site hosting by Duke Educational Media Services |